<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov">
        <title>Opinions for the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.</title>
        <description>Opinions appear on this site by 10:00 a.m. P.S.T on the day of release</description>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2009-11-06T10:01:16+01:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010066"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010065"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010061"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010062"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010063"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010064"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010059"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010060"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010055"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010056"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010057"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010058"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010052"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010053"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010054"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010050"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010051"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010049"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010043"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010044"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010045"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010046"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010047"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010048"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010042"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010040"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010041"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010037"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010038"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010039"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010034"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010035"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010036"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010033"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010030"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010031"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010032"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010026"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010027"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010028"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010029"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010023"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010024"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010025"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010021"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010022"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010020"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010019"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010017"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010018"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif">
        <title>ca9 logo</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov</link>
        <url>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010066">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NO OPINIONS FILED,  </title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010066</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/06/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010065">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CATHOLIC LEAGUE V CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 06-17328</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010065</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010061">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. HINKSON, 05-30303</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010061</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010062">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. REYES, 08-10047</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010062</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010063">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CONGREJO INVESTMENTS V. MANN, 08-15027</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010063</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010064">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ROBERTO COHEN V. USDC-CASJ, 09-70378</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010064</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010059">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. LIERA, 07-50546</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010059</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/04/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010060">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SHAPIRO V ASTRUE, 06-55822</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010060</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/04/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010055">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NORSE V. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, 07-15814</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010055</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/03/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010056">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ULRICH V. CIR, 08-70718</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010056</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/03/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010057">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: APPLIED MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION C V. THE SURGICAL COMPANY BV, 09-55155</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010057</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/03/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010058">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SHAPIRO V. ASTRUE, 06-55822</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010058</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/03/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010052">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. GARCIA-VILLALBA, 05-30506</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010052</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/02/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010053">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ROBINSON V. USA, 07-17052</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010053</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/02/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010054">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: VIVENDI SA V. T-MOBILE USA INC., 08-35561</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010054</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/02/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010050">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: GONZALES V. BROWN, 07-56107</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010050</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/30/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010051">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIO V. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRE, 08-15759</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010051</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/30/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010049">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. MIGUEL MORIEL-LUNA, 08-50124</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010049</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/29/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010043">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: STORMANS INC V. SELECKY, 07-36039</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010043</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010044">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SIRACUSANO V. MAATRIXX INITIATIVES, 06-15677</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010044</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010045">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. KILBRIDE, 07-10528</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010045</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010046">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: BRODHEIM V. CRY, 07-17081</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010046</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010047">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: WESTCHESTER FIRE V. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, 07-17383</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010047</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010048">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CA ENERGY COMMISSION V. DOE, 07-71576</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010048</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010042">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MOHAMED V JEPPESEN DATAPLAN, INC., 08-15693</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010042</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/27/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010040">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY V. JOHN MORRISON, 08-35246</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010040</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/27/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010041">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JENNIFER LASTER V. AT&amp;T MOBILITY LLC, 08-56394</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010041</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/27/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010037">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. RIVERA-ALONZO, 08-10081</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010037</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/26/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010038">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: LEONARD BOSACK V. DAVID SOWARD, 08-35248</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010038</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/26/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010039">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: OJO V. FARMERS GROUP, INC., 06-55522</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010039</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/26/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010034">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ALI V HICKMAN, 07-16731</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010034</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/23/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010035">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: BARKER V RIVERSIDE COUNTY, 07-56313</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010035</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/23/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010036">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V TRAN , 07-30270</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010036</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/23/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010033">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JOHN DOE#1 et al v REED et al, 09-35818</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010033</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/22/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010030">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: STERNBERG V JOHNSTON, 07-16870</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010030</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/22/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010031">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V VAN ALSTYNE, 07-50105</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010031</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/22/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010032">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: PARTH V POMONA VALLEY , 08-55022</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010032</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/22/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010026">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: WINN V GARRIOTT, 05-15754</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010026</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/21/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010027">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: GORMAN V WOLPOFF &amp; ABRAMSON , 06-17226</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010027</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/21/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010028">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CROCKETT &amp; MYERS V NAPIER, 07-16191</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010028</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/21/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010029">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: LONE STAR SECURITY V CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 07-56521</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010029</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/21/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010023">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MCSHERRY V CITY OF LONG BEACH, 06-55837</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010023</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/20/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010024">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V 186,416.00, 07-56549</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010024</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/20/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010025">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V TODD , 08-30360</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010025</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/20/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010021">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V WESSON, 08-30177</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010021</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/19/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010022">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL, 08-90241</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010022</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/19/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010020">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NO OPINIONS FILED TODAY,  </title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010020</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/16/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010019">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NO OPINIONS FILED TODAY,  </title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010019</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/15/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010017">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SPRINT PCS ASSETS V. CITY OF PALOS VERDES, 05-56106</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010017</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/14/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010018">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JOSEPH PADGETT V. BRIAN LOVENTHAL, 08-16720</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010018</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/14/2009</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
