<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/">
        <title>Published Opinions for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.</title>
        <description>Published Opinions appear on this site by 10:00 a.m. P.S.T on the day of release</description>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/ca9seal.png" />
       <dc:date>2012-05-21T07:00:09+01:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012230"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012226"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012227"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012228"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012229"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012224"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012225"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012223"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012222"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012219"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012220"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012221"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012218"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012216"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012217"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012215"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012214"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012210"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012211"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012212"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012213"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012209"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012206"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012207"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012205"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012201"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012202"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012203"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012204"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012208"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012200"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012197"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012198"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012199"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012194"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012195"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012196"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012193"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012192"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012191"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012188"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012189"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012190"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012185"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012186"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012187"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012184"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012181"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012182"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012183"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/ca9seal.png">
        <title>Seal of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov</link>
        <url>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/ca9seal.png</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012230">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SAMUEL LOPEZ V. JANICE BREWER, 12-16084</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012230</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/18/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012226">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: OTIS RODGERS V. JOHN MARSHALL, 10-55816</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012226</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/17/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012227">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: POM WONDERFUL LLC V. THE COCA COLA COMPANY, 10-55861</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012227</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/17/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012228">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. JESUS CERVANTES, 09-50521</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012228</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/17/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012229">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. JESUS CERVANTES - APPENDIX, 09-50521</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012229</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/17/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012224">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. JESUS CERVANTES, 09-50521</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012224</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/16/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012225">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SAMUEL LOPEZ V. JANICE BREWER, 12-16084</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012225</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/15/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012223">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SAMUEL LOPEZ V. JANICE BREWER, 12-16084</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012223</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/15/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012222">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SAMUEL LOPEZ V. JANICE BREWER, 12-16084</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012222</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/15/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012219">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: VANESSA SIMMONDS V. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES, 09-35262</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012219</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/15/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012220">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SEC V. CARL JASPER, 10-17064</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012220</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/15/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012221">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SAMUEL LOPEZ V. CHARLES RYAN, 12-99001</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012221</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/15/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012218">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MATTHEW SEXTON V MIKE COZNER, 10-35055</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012218</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/14/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012216">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: PAT OMAN V. PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 10-35340</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012216</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/14/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012217">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MATTHEW SEXTON V. MIKE COZNER, 10-35055</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012217</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/13/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012215">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. ORM HIENG, 09-10401</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012215</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/11/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012214">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: PACIFIC PICTURES v USDC-CALA, 11-71844</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012214</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/10/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012210">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SONYA RENEE V. ARNE DUNCAN, 08-16661</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012210</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/10/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012211">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: RALPH THOMAS V. KEVIN CHAPPELL, 09-99024</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012211</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/10/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012212">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. HUPING ZHOU, 10-50231</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012212</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/10/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012213">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. MICHAEL VALLEE, 11-30131</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012213</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/10/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012209">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JANET WOOD V. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, 10-56826</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012209</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/09/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012206">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JACK WARD V. RICARDO CHAVEZ, 09-17016</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012206</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/08/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012207">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MARTHA KARL V. CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, 11-35343</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012207</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/08/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012205">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, 08-16728</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012205</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/07/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012201">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: DARRYL NEDDS V. JOHN MARSHALL, 08-56520</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012201</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/04/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012202">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. AHMED RESSAM, 09-30000</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012202</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/04/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012203">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: HENRY A. V. MICHAEL WILLDEN, 10-17680</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012203</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/04/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012204">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: COURTNEY CROSBY V. T. SCHWARTZ, 10-17726</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012204</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/04/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012208">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: STERN V GAMBELLO, 10-56929</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012208</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/04/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012200">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: OSHODI V HOLDER , 08-71478</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012200</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/03/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012197">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CHANTELL SACKETT V. EPA, 08-35854</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012197</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/03/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012198">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: DANIEL O. OYENIRAN V ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., 09-73683</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012198</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/03/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012199">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ESTATE OF ANNE W. MORGENS, DEC V. CIR, 10-73698</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012199</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/03/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012194">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: DETRICH V. RYAN, 08-99001</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012194</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/02/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012195">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JOSE PADILLA V. JOHN YOO, 09-16478</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012195</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/02/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012196">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JENNIE BELTRAN V. MICHAEL ASTRUE, 09-56255</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012196</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/02/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012193">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NO OPINIONS FILED TODAY,   </title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012193</link>
        <description>Date filed: 05/01/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012192">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. DEVAUGHN DORSEY, 10-30278</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012192</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/30/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012191">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NO OPINIONS FILED TODAY,   </title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012191</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/27/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012188">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MARTIN CROWLEY V. STATE OF NEVADA, 10-17887</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012188</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/26/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012189">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. MICHAEL BACKLUND, 10-30264</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012189</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/26/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012190">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: KEVIN BUCKWALTER V. STATE OF NEVADA BOARD, 11-15742</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012190</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/26/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012185">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: HILARIO RIVAS V. JANET NAPOLITANO, 09-56843</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012185</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/25/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012186">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TH, 10-35836</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012186</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/25/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012187">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. JOHN APEL, 11-50003</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012187</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/25/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012184">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. BRANO MILOVANOVIC, 08-30381</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012184</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/24/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012181">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ROBLES-URREA V. HOLDER, 06-71935</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012181</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/23/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012182">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: EDWARD MERAS V. D.K. SISTO, 09-15399</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012182</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/23/2012</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012183">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MYRNA JACOBSON V. MYRNA JACOBSON, 10-60040</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000012183</link>
        <description>Date filed: 04/23/2012</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

