<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/">
        <title>Opinions for the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.</title>
        <description>Opinions appear on this site by 10:00 a.m. P.S.T on the day of release</description>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2010-02-09T16:07:51+01:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010278"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010279"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010280"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010281"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010273"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010274"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010275"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010276"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010277"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010270"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010271"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010272"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010268"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010269"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010267"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010264"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010265"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010266"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010259"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010260"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010261"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010262"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010263"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010254"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010255"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010256"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010257"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010258"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010253"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010249"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010250"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010251"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010252"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010244"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010245"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010246"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010247"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010243"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010239"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010240"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010241"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010242"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010235"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010236"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010237"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010238"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010233"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010234"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010230"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010231"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif">
        <title>ca9 logo</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov</link>
        <url>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010278">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: RICHARD SCHULTZ V. THOMAS BURKE, 08-17304</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010278</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/09/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010279">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. PETER VONGXAY, 09-10072</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010279</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/09/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010280">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: EFF V. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 09-17235</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010280</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/09/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010281">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: BULL V CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 05-17080</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010281</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/09/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010273">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: GONZALEZ V. HOLDER, 05-74165</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010273</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/08/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010274">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: YOKOYAMA V. MIDLAND NATIONAL, 07-16825</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010274</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/08/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010275">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: STERNBERG V. JOHNSTON, 07-16870</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010275</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/08/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010276">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. JUVENILE, 07-50107</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010276</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/08/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010277">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: AREZOU MANSOURIAN V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF C, 08-16330</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010277</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/08/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010270">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MORTIMER V. BACA, 07-55393</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010270</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/05/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010271">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MICHAEL OMSTEAD V. DELL, INC., 08-16479</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010271</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/05/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010272">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ROBERT WAGGY V. SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, 09-35133</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010272</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/05/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010268">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: HAIGHT V. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE, 07-16857</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010268</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/04/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010269">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: AGUILAR-RAMOS V. HOLDER, 07-70240</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010269</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/04/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010267">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V GUILLERMO AGUILA-MONTES DE OCA, 05-50170</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010267</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/03/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010264">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. ALDERMAN, 07-30186</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010264</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/03/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010265">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: PROSHIPLINE INC V. ASPEN INFRASTRUCTURES LTD, 08-35337</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010265</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/03/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010266">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: J. CORONA-MENDEZ V. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., 08-72492</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010266</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/03/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010259">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. RAYFORD TERRELL, 08-10560</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010259</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/02/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010260">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. CONTRERAS, 08-50126</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010260</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/02/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010261">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: EQUATORIAL MARINE FUEL MANAGEM V. MISC BERHAD, 08-57046</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010261</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/02/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010262">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. AHMED RESSAM, 09-30000</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010262</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/02/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010263">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. JEROME LOEW, 09-30032</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010263</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/02/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010254">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. CHERLYN NAPULOU, 08-10190</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010254</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/01/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010255">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: RIVER RUNNERS V. ALSTON, 08-15112</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010255</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/01/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010256">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SYLVIA MAHACH-WATKINS V. LARRY DEPEE, 08-15694</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010256</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/01/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010257">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA V. JOHN FINDLEY, III, 08-60024</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010257</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/01/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010258">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: RIVERS RUNNERS V ALSTON, 08-15112</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010258</link>
        <description>Date filed: 02/01/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010253">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: COTO SETTLEMENT V. IAN EISENBERG, 08-35966</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010253</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/29/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010249">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CHASE MANHATTAN BANK V. TAXEL, 07-55266</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010249</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/28/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010250">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ESQUIVEL-GARCIA V. HOLDER, 07-70640</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010250</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/28/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010251">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: THE NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' R V. STEVEN JOBS, 08-16488</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010251</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/28/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010252">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. RANDALL TREADWELL, 08-50562</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010252</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/28/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010244">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: KAWASHIMA V. HOLDER, 04-74313</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010244</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/27/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010245">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CROWE V. WRISLEY, 05-55467</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010245</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/27/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010246">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. STATE OF WASHINGTON, 08-35794</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010246</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/27/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010247">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: VERONICA VELASCO CERVANTES V. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., 08-73295</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010247</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/27/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010243">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CHAPMAN V. PIER 1 IMPORTS, 07-16326</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010243</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/26/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010239">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: RICHARDSON V. RUNNELS, 07-16736</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010239</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/26/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010240">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. JUVENILE, 07-50107</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010240</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/26/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010241">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA V. ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL P, 08-35528</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010241</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/26/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010242">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JAMES MCDERMOTT V. AMPERSAND PUBLISHING, LLC, 08-56202</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010242</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/26/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010235">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ANAYA-ORTIZ V. HOLDER, 03-74666</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010235</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/25/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010236">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: HELLS CANYON V. USFS, 07-35456</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010236</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/25/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010237">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: TOM HARDISTY V. MICHAEL ASTRUE, 08-35919</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010237</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/25/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010238">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ANN CHAE V. SLM CORPORATION, 08-56154</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010238</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/25/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010233">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CHARLES SCHWAB V. CHANDLER, 07-15261</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010233</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/22/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010234">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. GREEN, 08-10149</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010234</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/22/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010230">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: TREJO-MEJIA V. HOLDER, 05-76728</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010230</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/21/2010</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010231">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: DONNA HOFFMAN V. KENT TONNEMACHER, 08-16166</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010231</link>
        <description>Date filed: 01/21/2010</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
