<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov">
        <title>Opinions for the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.</title>
        <description>Opinions appear on this site by 10:00 a.m. P.S.T on the day of release</description>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2009-11-20T10:30:20+01:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010088"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010089"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010090"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010091"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010092"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010083"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010084"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010085"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010087"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010086"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010080"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010081"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010082"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010079"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010077"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010078"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010076"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010075"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010074"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010068"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010069"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010070"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010071"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010072"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010073"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010067"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010066"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010065"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010061"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010062"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010063"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010064"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010059"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010060"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010055"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010056"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010057"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010058"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010052"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010053"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010054"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010050"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010051"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010049"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010043"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010044"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010045"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010046"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010047"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010048"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif">
        <title>ca9 logo</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov</link>
        <url>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/images/logo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010088">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: DELANO FARMS COMPANY V. CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISS, 08-16233</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010088</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/20/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010089">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ELLEN LEVINE V. EDWARD T. SCHAFER, 08-16441</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010089</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/20/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010090">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JOSEPH PADGETT V. BRIAN LOVENTHAL, 08-16720</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010090</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/20/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010091">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CLYDE REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT, ARIZONA, 08-17384</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010091</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/20/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010092">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SEVERO V. CIR, 08-70817</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010092</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/20/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010083">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: FLEMING V. YUMA REGIONAL MEDICA, 07-16427</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010083</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/19/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010084">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ROBERT MONTOUR V. HARTFORD LIFE &amp; ACCIDENT INSUR, 08-55803</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010084</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/19/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010085">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: KRISTIN PERRY V. CAMPAIGN FOR CALIFORNIA FAMILI, 09-16959</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010085</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/19/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010087">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: IN THE MATTER OF KAREN GOLINSKI, 09-80173</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010087</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/19/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010086">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: IN THE MATTER OF KAREN GOLINSKI, 09-80173</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010086</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/19/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010080">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CELL THERAPEUTICS INC V. LASH GROUP INC, 08-35619</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010080</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/18/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010081">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. HUGO GUTIERREZ-SANCHEZ, 08-50254</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010081</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/18/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010082">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: IN THE MATTER OF BRAD LEVENSON, 09-80172</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010082</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/18/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010079">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: APPLIED MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION C V. THE SURGICAL COMPANY BV, 09-55155</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010079</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/17/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010077">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. WILLIAM MAHAN, 08-30475</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010077</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/16/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010078">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: LAHOTI V. VERICHECK INC, 08-35001</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010078</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/16/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010076">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER V. ARELMA, INC., 09-15573</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010076</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/13/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010075">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NO OPINIONS FILED TODAY,   </title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010075</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/13/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010074">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: JOYCE MATSUO V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 08-15553</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010074</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/12/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010068">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NATIONAL PARKS &amp; CON V. KAISER EAGLE MTN., 05-56814</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010068</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/10/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010069">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. AMEZCUA-VASQUEZ, 07-50239</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010069</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/10/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010070">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: DAVID BURKE V. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, 08-15658</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010070</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/10/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010071">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. JOSE AMBRIZ-AMBRIZ, 08-30431</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010071</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/10/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010072">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ROMUALDO BERMUDEZ V. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., 08-72133</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010072</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/10/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010073">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: IN RE: GERALD R. SMITH  , 09-80163</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010073</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/10/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010067">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. ADRICK RUCKES, 08-30088</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010067</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/09/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010066">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NO OPINIONS FILED,  </title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010066</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/06/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010065">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CATHOLIC LEAGUE V CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 06-17328</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010065</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010061">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. HINKSON, 05-30303</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010061</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010062">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. REYES, 08-10047</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010062</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010063">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CONGREJO INVESTMENTS V. MANN, 08-15027</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010063</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010064">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ROBERTO COHEN V. USDC-CASJ, 09-70378</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010064</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/05/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010059">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. LIERA, 07-50546</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010059</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/04/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010060">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SHAPIRO V ASTRUE, 06-55822</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010060</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/04/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010055">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: NORSE V. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, 07-15814</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010055</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/03/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010056">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ULRICH V. CIR, 08-70718</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010056</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/03/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010057">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: APPLIED MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION C V. THE SURGICAL COMPANY BV, 09-55155</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010057</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/03/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010058">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SHAPIRO V. ASTRUE, 06-55822</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010058</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/03/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010052">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. GARCIA-VILLALBA, 05-30506</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010052</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/02/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010053">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: ROBINSON V. USA, 07-17052</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010053</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/02/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010054">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: VIVENDI SA V. T-MOBILE USA INC., 08-35561</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010054</link>
        <description>Date filed: 11/02/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010050">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: GONZALES V. BROWN, 07-56107</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010050</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/30/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010051">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIO V. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRE, 08-15759</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010051</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/30/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010049">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. MIGUEL MORIEL-LUNA, 08-50124</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010049</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/29/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010043">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: STORMANS INC V. SELECKY, 07-36039</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010043</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010044">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: SIRACUSANO V. MAATRIXX INITIATIVES, 06-15677</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010044</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010045">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: USA V. KILBRIDE, 07-10528</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010045</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010046">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: BRODHEIM V. CRY, 07-17081</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010046</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010047">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: WESTCHESTER FIRE V. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, 07-17383</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010047</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010048">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:creator>US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</dc:creator>
        <title> Case: CA ENERGY COMMISSION V. DOE, 07-71576</title>
        <link>http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/opinions/view_subpage.php?pk_id=0000010048</link>
        <description>Date filed: 10/28/2009</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
